Assessment Methods in Physical Education: Advancements, Challenges, and Best Practices

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 31, 2024
https://doi.org/10.36676/iss.v1.i1.06
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Jan - Mar 2024

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Mr. Jagdish Patel
Coordinator, Athletics Program Ahmedabad University, Gujarat

Abstract

Assessment in physical education (PE) has evolved significantly in recent years, reflecting changes in educational philosophy, advancements in technology, and a growing emphasis on accountability and evidence-based practice. the advancements, challenges, and best practices in assessment methods within the field of PE. The evolution of assessment methods in PE has seen a shift from traditional, performance-based assessments to more holistic approaches that encompass a range of learning outcomes, including cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. Advancements in assessment technology, such as digital tools and wearable devices, have provided new opportunities for collecting and analyzing data on student performance and progress.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mr. Jagdish Patel. (2024). Assessment Methods in Physical Education: Advancements, Challenges, and Best Practices. Innovations in Sports Science, 1(1), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.36676/iss.v1.i1.06

References

  1. Kirk, D. (2013). Educational value and models-based practice in physical education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(9), 973-986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.785352
  2. Siedentop, D., & Locke, L. (2019). Making sport education models work: A practitioner's guide to models-based practice. Human Kinetics.
  3. O'Sullivan, M., MacPhail, A., & O'Connor, J. (2015). Values-based practice and models-based practice: potential for teacher education in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 20(2), 254-272.
  4. Hastie, P. A., Sinelnikov, O. A., & Wallhead, T. L. (2014). Teaching personal and social responsibility through physical activity. Human Kinetics.
  5. Metzler, M. W. (2017). Instructional models for physical education. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213521
  6. Silverman, S., & Ennis, C. D. (2008). Student learning in physical education–applying research to enhance instruction. Human Kinetics.
  7. McKenzie, T. L., & Lounsbery, M. A. (2013). Physical education teacher effectiveness in a public health context. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 84(4), 419-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2013.844025
  8. Sallis, J. F., McKenzie, T. L., Beets, M. W., Beighle, A., & Erwin, H. (2012). Physical education's role in public health: Steps forward and backward over 20 years and HOPE for the future. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83(2), 125-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5641/027013612800745329
  9. National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2009). Moving into the future: National standards for physical education (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics.
  10. World Health Organization. (2018). Global action plan on physical activity 2018-2030: more active people for a healthier world. World Health Organization.