Physical Education Curriculum Trends: A Comparative Analysis

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 30, 2024
https://doi.org/10.36676/iss.v1.i3.14
Download
Pdf
Statistic
Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Jul - Sep 2024

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Prof. Meenakshi Reddy
Navnirmit Solutions, Hyderabad

Abstract

Physical education (PE) curriculum trends are always altering in response to the changing needs and expectations of students, educators, and society as a whole. This is a sign that PE is becoming increasingly popular. aims to discover similarities, discrepancies, and emerging themes by conducting a comparative examination of the trends in physical education curriculum across a variety of school settings and geographies. The purpose of this study is to give insights into the way that physical education is headed in the 21st century by analysing physical education curriculum elements and changes. spans a wide variety of topics, such as the content of the curriculum, the teaching methodology, the assessment approaches, and the use of technology. To accommodate a wide range of student groups, to encourage inclusiveness, and to match with larger educational goals such as physical literacy and fitness for life, physical education (PE) curriculum are always evolving.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Reddy, M. (2024). Physical Education Curriculum Trends: A Comparative Analysis. Innovations in Sports Science, 1(3), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.36676/iss.v1.i3.14

References

  1. Ahmed, N. (2018). Study of Curriculum and Planning in Sports. Innovative Research Thoughts, 4(3), 324–328. Retrieved from https://irt.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/1346
  2. Ayyalasomayajula, Madan Mohan Tito, and Sailaja Ayyalasomayajula. Proactive Scaling Strategies for Cost-Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization in Cloud-Based Machine Learning Models: A Comprehensive Review. 2021.
  3. Ayyalasomayajula, Madan Mohan Tito. ‘Innovative Water Quality Prediction for Efficient Management Using Ensemble Learning’. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, vol. 29, no. 4, 2023, pp. 2374–2381.
  4. Bailey, R. (2006). Physical education and sport in schools: A review of benefits and outcomes. Journal of School Health, 76(8), 397-401.
  5. Chen, A. (2019). The role of physical education in promoting physical activity and health in Asia. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 8(1), 1-2.
  6. Chen, S., & Lamb, P. (2020). Innovative trends in physical education and sport: From ancient to postmodern. In Routledge Handbook of Physical Education Pedagogies (pp. 1-21). Routledge.
  7. Dinesh. (2018). Physical Education and Planning in Sports: A review. Innovative Research Thoughts, 4(2), 281–287. Retrieved from https://irt.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/520
  8. Dinesh. (2024). A review of Effectiveness of Physical Education in the Schools. Innovative Research Thoughts, 4(1), 376–380. Retrieved from https://irt.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/1298
  9. Dr. Poonam Singh. (2022). Social-emotional learning and cultural competence: A Review. International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 13(4), 119–123. Retrieved from https://jrps.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/293
  10. Doll-Tepper, G., & Scoretz, D. (2014). Physical education in German schools: Changing values, trends, and issues. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 85(2), 26-30.
  11. Ennis, C. D. (2017). The definition of physical education: Whiteheadian considerations. Quest, 69(4), 371-387.
  12. Hastie, P. A., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2019). Reflections on the future of physical education. Strategies, 33(6), 11-13.
  13. Howley, D. (2011). Physical education: Preparing students for a lifetime of physical activity. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 82(2), 10-13.
  14. Hardman, K., & Marshall, J. (2000). World-wide survey of the state and status of school physical education: Final report to UNESCO. Revue Éducation Physique et Sport, 53(273), 135-146.
  15. Kirk, D., & Macdonald, D. (2001). Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72(2), 169-182.
  16. Kumar, D. M. (2017). EDUCATION AND VALUES: A PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH. Innovative Research Thoughts, 3(11), 513–519. Retrieved from https://irt.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/1239
  17. Kumari, S. (2017). All Students with Special Educational Needs (SEN) Be Included in Mainstream Education Provision. Innovative Research Thoughts, 3(4), 1–6. Retrieved from https://irt.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/411
  18. MS. Parul Jain, & Dr. (Ms.) Sangeeta Jain. (2016). Research On The Impact Of Co-Curricular Activities On Personality Development Of Senior Secondary School Students. International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 7(2). Retrieved from https://jrps.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/780
  19. Ronak. (2013). Reviewing new education Emotional learning and cultural competency policy. International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 4(2), 18–23. Retrieved from https://jrps.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/27
  20. Silverman, S., & Subramaniam, P. R. (2001). Curriculum trends in physical education: A follow-up survey. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 72(2), 36-41.
  21. Shah, M. (2014). Educational Policy Analysis: Examining Trends and Implications. Global International Research Thoughts, 2(1), 20–25. Retrieved from https://girt.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/9
  22. Shweta Jain. (2016). Study Of Changing Context Of Teacher Education In The Indian Scenario. International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 7(4). Retrieved from https://jrps.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/840

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.